Walzer starts from feudal, hierarchical societies as ones where social prejudgments dominate individual judgments (§6), and then characterizes recognition (§7) and its domination (§8) in the modern society, as well as the nature of public recognition (§8) and self-respect, self-esteem, and self-possession (§9). Then I turn to discuss Walzer’s chapter on recognition in the Spheres of Justice, starting with an overview (§5). Then I will ask whether recognition can fruitfully be seen as a “good” to be distributed (§4). Then I will characterize his pluralistic view on complex equality and the idea of dominance of one good over another (§3). ""I will first contrast Walzer’s hermeneutical views on social criticism with that of critical theory and more universalistic theories (§2). Keywords: Justice Politics Hermeneutics Interpretative theories. Warnke proposes a political theory whose task is to provide conditions for aįruitful dialogue between the various positions within political life, but itĭoes not solve the problem of difficult-to-resolve disagreements that arise Meanings of social traditions and norms ─ Rawls and Habermas ─, or toĪdherence to overly partisan or political views ─ Walzer and Dworkin. Lack of a major concern about differences in interpretations about the What she considers to be weaknesses in their theories, related either to the Society actually accepts and interprets them. Norms, and values, not in universal and abstract principles, but in how Turn, which is characterized by justifying social institutions, traditions, Recognized the presence of what she calls the interpretive or hermeneutic Works of Walzer, Rawls, Dworkin, and Habermas. Specifically, she has written extensively about the Georgia Warnke has analyzed the positions of relevant authors on justiceĪnd political philosophy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |